НОВОТО ПОКОЛЕНИЕ И ПРОЧИТА МУ НА ИЗКОННИТЕ ЦЕННОСТИ

Пламен Пенев Пенев

THE NEW GENERATION AND ITS READING OF PRIMITIVE VALUES

Plamen Penev Penev

Abstract: We live in an age which is strange and timeless, excessive with interweavings and a combination of hopes and fears.

Hopes are a projection of the expectation that the World is entering a new Golden Age of creation, and a polysemiotic constructive archetype.

Fears arise from the noticeable and accelerated decline of traditional values ​​and institutional structures – secular and religious; and from the idea and the misconception that a future is being built in which only the strongest and most ruthless survive and rule all levels of society. And the Bulgarian modern society from the beginning of the XXI century is in absolute sync, with the passives and positives of the world leading tendencies in cultural, social and ideological sense. The new generations of the native Bulgarian present and future are the embodied and true reality of this wide planetary framework, characterizing our troubled and fleeting epoch. The positive perspectives, based on the technicalized and hypercivilized essence of being, are theirs, of these generations, also the liabilities, as unknowns, abysses of existential doubts and trials as a whole. We are also witnessing at the epicenter of the transition, the crossroads of a kind of inaction between a period of the passing and the unidentified, also unexplained in its essence, new present and future. The characteristics of this kind of “row spacing” are the hallmarks of the new generations, including, especially in the Bulgarian society, which set the essential signs of our very future and possible prospects for public and national life.

Keywords: values; hypermodernism; generation; person; modernity; world

Download full paper: PPenev

---

ЛИТЕРАТУРА

Бодрияр, Ж. (2003). Системата на предметите. София, с. 176.

Ватимо, Д. (2004). Краят на модерността. София, 2004, с. 123.

Верин, Д. (2001). Философия и завръщане към себепознанието. София, с. 96.

Дичев, И. (2002). От принадлежност към идентичност. София, с. 69.

Еко, У. (1993). Семиотика и философия на езика. София, с. 229.

Елюл, Ж. (2003). Унизеното слово. София, с. 114.

Карлайл, Т. (1997). Героите, преклонението пред героите и героичното в историята. София, с. 95.

Лаш, С. (2004). Критика на информацията. София, с. 98, 140, 181.

Лиотар, Ж. (2002). Постмодерни поуки. София, с. 189.

Маклуън, М. (1995). Закони на медиите. София, с. 79,104, 270.

Тейлър, Ч. (1999). Безпокойството на модерността. София, с. 22.

Фридман, Л. (2002). Хоризонталното общество. София, с. 34.

LITERATURE

Bodriar, J. (2003). The System of Objects. Sofia, p. 176.

Carlile, T. (1997). Heroes, the worship of heroes and the heroic in history. Sofia, 1997, p. 95.

Dichev, I. ​​(2002). From belonging to identity. Sofia, p. 69.

Eco, W. (1993). Semiotics and philosophy of language. Sofia, p. 229.

Elyul, J. (2003). The Humiliated Word. Sofia, p. 114.

Friedman, L. ​​(2002). The Horizontal Society. Sofia, p. 34.

Lash, S. (2004). Critique of information. Sofia, p. 98, 140, 181.

Liotar, J. ​​(2002). Postmodern Lessons. Sofia, p. 189.

McLowan, M. (1995). Laws of the Media. Sofia, p. 79,104, 270.

Taylor, C. (1999). The Anxiety of Modernity. Sofia, p. 22.

Verin, D. (2001). Philosophy and return to self-knowledge. Sofia, p. 96.

Watimo, J.J. (2004). The end of modernity. p. 123.

 

 

 

 

Autor Info:

Assist. Plamen Penev Penev, PhD

Faculty of Education

Trakia University, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria

e-mail: plamenpenev1971@abv.bg