Summary:
PURPOSE
Determining criteria for distinguishing artificial intelligence production and human creation
METHOD
Some experiments were conducted through artificial intelligence. The relevant literature was reviewed.
FINDINGS
Artificial intelligence plays an important role in many areas today. This role is more effective in the processing of existing knowledge and production. Scientific creation and artistic creation are different processes from production. Eureka, that is, the process of invention and creation, requires a human instrument in addition to the existing knowledge accumulation. This instrument is not the random or intentional union of a plural collected mind. Creation and invention emerge with the necessity of the individual human instrument, knowledge-emotion, accumulation and situations, intuitions; needs and priorities. Today, the use of artificial intelligence in art has become widespread. A work that has not been used in computer technology or photography technology is almost considered primitive. Exhibitions consisting of works designed by artificial intelligence are opened and competitions are organized. Artistic creation is not the ability to give commands. Today, it is not possible to distinguish an original, human-designed work of art from a product designed by artificial intelligence. Ethical violations and copyright problems may occur more in the coming period due to artificial intelligence. Original, human-created works may be more sought after. If artificial intelligence and human-created works have concrete, distinctive qualities, they should be determined.
RESULTS
The ethical-aesthetic and technical privileges of artistic creation have been questioned from the formation process to the work. It has been discussed how artificial intelligence can direct the perception of art, art education and human development.
Keywords: Art Education, Artificial Intelligence, Human Creation, Creativity, Invention, Contemporary Art
REFERENCES
Bellaiche et al. (2023). Humans versus AI: whether and why we prefer human‑created compared to AI‑created artwork Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications (2023) 8:42,p.4 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-023-00499-6
Benjamin,W. (2005). Teknik Olarak Yeniden Üretilebilirlik Çağında Sanat Yapıtı, (G. Sarı Çev.), 1. Basım , İstanbul: Zeplin Kitap , pp.13,15,21
Connor A. M. et al (2014). An unexpected journey: experiences of learning through exploration and experimentation. In: DesignEd Asia conference 2014. Honk Kong Design Institute, Hong Kong
Hong, J.-W., & Curran, N. M. (2019). Artificial Intelligence, artists, and art: Attitudes toward artwork produced by humans versus Artificial Intelligence. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, 15(2s), 58:1-58:16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3326337
Israfilzade, K. (2020). What’s in a name? Experiment on the aesthetic judgments of art procured by Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Arts, 3, 143–158. https:// doi. org/ 10. 31566/ arts.3. 011
Kuypers & Clercq (2024). The interaction between Artificial Intelligence and design: an analysis under EU design law https://gevers.eu/blog/the-interaction-between-artificial-intelligence-and-design-an-analysis-under-eu-design-law/
Lindström, L. (2006). Creativity:What Is It? Can You Assess It? Can It Be Taught? JADE 25.1 The Author. Journal compilation © 2006 NSEAD/Blackwell Publishing Ltd., pp.62-64
May, R. (2001) Yaratma Cesareti . Edit. Müge Gürsoy Sökmen Metis Yayınları İstanbul p.73;p.83
Newman, G. E., & Bloom, P. (2012). Art and authenticity: The importance of originals in judgments of value. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 141(3), 558–569. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ a0026 035
Özgültekin, B. (2023). Art Niyet Sanatçı Olmak , Hayalperest Yayınevi, İstanbul,s.386
Saini, A. (2016).Artificial Intelligence a Threat AI International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI) Vol. 5, No. 3, September 2016, pp. 117~118
Temel, B. (2009).Sanat eserlerinin yapay sinir ağları ile özgünlük tespiti ve ayrıştırılması / Marmara Üniversitesi / Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü / Güzel Sanatlar Eğitimi Ana Bilim Dalı / Resim-İş Öğretmenliği Bilim Dalı Doctorate Thesis , İstanbul
Tunalı, İ. (1989). Estetik, İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi, s.16
Xu, K., Liu, F., Mou, Y., Wu, Y., Zeng, J., & Schäfer, M. S. (2020). Using machine learning to learn machines: A cross-cultural study of users’ responses to machine-generated artworks. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64(4), 566–591. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 08838 151. 2020. 18351 36
Zagalo N., Branco P. (2015). Creativity in the Digital Age Springer-Verlag London (9:10). p.42
Author Info:
Assoc.Prof. Mehtap Dede Kodaman, PhD
Faculty of Education
Trakya University – Edirne, Turkey
е-mail: mehtapkodaman@trakya.edu.tr
English 
Български